

More fun if you go via the neck
More fun if you go via the neck
So who do you stand with?
That having been said I don’t actually know why you’re responding to me. It sounds like you have some kind of actual evidence backing up your beliefs (whatever those beliefs may be) which means you don’t fall into the category of stupid we were discussing.
It makes the road surface slicker, as I said.
Nowhere did I support Texas
Nowhere did I say the way that crosswalks are is bad
I said maybe having a slicker than usual stretch of road leading up to a crosswalk would be bad, which isn’t what’s happening
What’s more, you literally have a response next to mine on this subthread where you are clearly in agreement with me.
Should be illegal everywhere
Based on a sample of 1, we have determined that the human race should no longer exist.
Goodbye
Your words say leaders but your words say not leaders
Another solid argument that gets right to the real point of all this.
Makes sense, thanks for the explanation
No, he said everything else is some type of castle. I looked this castle up and it aligns well with the idea that he’s trying to shut down the other claims without considering them.
From the wiki:
where an arguer conflates two positions that share similarities: one modest and easy to defend (the “motte”) and one much more controversial and harder to defend (the “bailey”)
So he’s technically saying that the rest of the post is modest claims which are easy to defend, ie he agrees with Y. (I’m assuming the bailey is genocide and the motte is the claims of ethnic cleansing w/out genocide)
deleted by creator
Shouldnt this be “improve on the silence”? If you talk there is not silence so you cannot improve the silence by talking. But you can improve on the silence with good words making.
Says the person who deliberately called themselves sweet fart
I personally think a better question is what are you trying to get out of posting this? I mean if you want someone to tell you what a good lefty you are you can always go on buzzfeed, so what’s the goal here?
That’s too bad, because neither of those is the case. I personally think your attempt to kill the conversation above with your “stop typing” and again now with this comment is an actually an attempt to hide your head in the sand, but I guess we’ll never know.
Valuable addition. I ask “why is that inference wrong” and you say “no”.
If there’s a permanent global fingerprint code isn’t that, well, the opposite of what the marketing says? Why is that not a unique user identifier?
Accurate, meat is universally gross