I think you need to be American. It is funny how the Americans are busy explaining the drug to you, but failing to understand that it is the underlying premise that most non-Americans won’t get.

But that is the point, they are not fighting over it.

Of course it would have lasted long. It had lasted basically the entire existence of human populated India up until then.

Apparently they have to make sure even the most dimwitted has recieved the notice that Elon Musk “definitely isn’t part of this administration anymore, pinky swear and everything”.

Has their medicaid program been unaffected by the Trump cuts?

I was going to say Sid Meier’s Civilization, but both of them qualifies really.

He also bragged about them doing it on camera. So there is that.

The bread and circus would need to go away first, so probably never going to happen.

“In fact this will be the greatest leap forward. A big beautiful leap!” and the hateful morons will cheer as he says it.

Apparently every time Nirvana is mentioned it equals suicide, and that is funny for some reason.

That is just such a useless relativisation of the issue. There are problems all over the world sure, but there are also varying degrees of these problems. The US is facing a lot of different problems than the EU for example. So just saying “that is just human nature” is self-defeating and wrong, because obviously some of the problems the US faces have been fixed, or at least mitigated, to a varying degree elsewhere.

Fascists loves when people just sit back and let themselves be exploited because they think that is the natural order of things.

Not necessary. They pay him a lot of money for saying it.

Even if you love porn and grew up exposed to it as a kid, you gotta admit that there are psychological effects on avid adult viewers and more on minors.

No you don’t. That is right wing propaganda completely unfounded by science. That porn addiction nonsense so many Americans babble about is a product of that propaganda, and doesn’t actually exist.

That is not what they are saying. It is perfectly valid to say that there are zero contemporary primary sources to confirm the existence of Jesus. Historians have come to the consensus that he most likely existed, on account of the influence stemming from later sources, but they all also know there are no contemporary sources, so that consensus is based on circumstantial evidence.

The historicity of Paul is not robust, it is definitely better sourced than Jesus, but that historicity stems from himself, and as we cannot take his supernatural religous experiences for fact (he can very well have believed them as fact, but we know that they cannot have happened in objective reality like that), he is not exactly the most reliable witness in the first place.

I think Harry Potter is pretty shitty and uninteresting fiction. It is not really a constructive argument though, because it is entirely subjective. A lot of people thinks that Lovecraft wrote some great and interesting fiction, so I am not really sure what you are trying to say.

Considering the entire history of the US is one big upwards transfer of wealth, that is really saying something.