Communist

Can you give a specific example of how bluesky could be?

I really don’t see how it could matter tbh

I think lemmy should get atproto support too.

Bluesky is not proprietary, it’s mit licensed and open source

Bluesky is mit licensed, if it goes bad what’s to stop a fork? Once there’s interop between the protocols will it matter at all?

I hate teams because it consistently doesn’t just work

missed notifications, screensharing

i have little use of it and it constantly breaks

Nah, I have ulterior motives, the more people on linux, the more support linux gets, the easier it is to move people to linux, the more support it gets…

And I can’t stand using windows.

Oh no… won’t anybody think of the poor billionares??

If you send me a message on matrix or a dm here I can help you with that unlimited no strings attached, I have over 10 years of experience and am very free!

Why do you think the oneplus open is any different?

it also scratches at a level 2 with deeper grooves at a level 3, that’s the fundamental problem here.

i’ve watched all of them, actually, the problem is how easy it is to puncture the display with sand.

deeper grooves at a level 3 just won’t ever do for me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yt5tCAIvn2w this ain’t it.

I watch jerryrig everything haha, they do not yet meet my standards

https://www.etsy.com/listing/1061091736/mini-guitar-for-clone-hero-guitar-hero

I love this!

30$ if you assemble it yourself. 60$ if you don’t.

It’s not ready for me until it’s durable

If they figure out durable scratch resistant creaseless foldables, it’s actually over for form factor changes

it is factually just different brand-name.

Everything in china goes through the chinese censors, nobody is saying that china isn’t heavily censored, but that’s tiktok and it’s available in china. Who cares about the name? So many things have different names by country.

It’s owned by the same company and is the same app with a different name…

tiktok just has a different name in china…

That’s not true either…

tiktok is completely allowed in china

it’s called douyin and is the same thing owned by the same company

Source: dude just trust me

TikTok is not banned in china.

No, the reason religion is excluded is because delusions aren’t supposed to reflect cultural conditioning. Delusions are, by their very definition, an abnormal brain process. Cultural beliefs are not abnormal brain processes, no matter how irrational they are.

That’s what i’m saying, the reason that cultural beliefs aren’t allowed to be delusions is simply because they don’t want to make religion a delusion. It’s common, so, it’s not a delusion. That’s the end of the reasoning. Should we really say that anything that’s commonly believed isn’t a delusion? I think that’s an exception made for a logical reason, it defends the field of psychology from culture, but cultures can share delusions.

Please understand that this exception is accepted by the entire field of psychology. If you disagree with it, you have 200 years of psychological debate and study to contend with. Don’t pretend you’ve read enough to claim you have grounds to disagree with something the entire field of psychology considers a settled issue. No matter how much you wish religion is a mental illness, it’s not. Sadly, the irrationality of religion is fully explainable within the bounds of normal human psychology.

The reason this exception exists is precisely as i’ve said, they’ve special cased it because they don’t want to define religion/cultural beliefs as mental illnesses. The very reason for this exception is because they don’t want it to count, not because it doesn’t meet every single other (much more important might I add) criteria.

they’re essentially going “yeah, these are delusions, but uh, enough people believe them and we don’t want to piss them off so here’s an exception”

I personally don’t think that’s valid at all, but I can see why they’d do it.

Just because a delusion is normal to have, doesn’t mean it shouldn’t be a delusion.