If you hear back well they did not realize… you answer with yes, this is how little they care
If you hear back well they did not realize… you answer with yes, this is how little they care
If it is based around link preview vector, then any platform is suceptible.
I like how not voting against an obvious fascist is pro Palestine.
Another reminder that fascists embolden fascists. Putin is one. Netanyahu is one. Trump is one. Vance is one. Musk is one.
Couchfucker said we cannot band The Dipshit
The barrage of he is a dictator, know it, expect it news is beating the rest into complacency.
I cannot isolate the moment when magnets were known to humans. Magnets = satan.
Because they are expensive. More importantly, how often does the function of a button is changed? Top right corner button on android is usually a back button (arrow/ x) or a profile icon. How often does a bottom navigation in an app change? Dashboard is an app that rarely changes.
I will do you one better. The screen in the button goes out. If the button changes the display based on the context, what does the button do? Is software responsible to recognize it cannot display an action and do something? What does it do? Should the user be responsible to remember what does the button do based on the context? This article is about return to physical buttons because they are reliable. Do you see any button on your cars dashboard that is unlabeled? Do you remember looking up in a manual what a weirdly iconed button does? On any piece of hardware.
This is from users perspecrtive alone.
Lets do the manufacturer. Imagine that screen buttons have SKUs. Dashboards have SKUs. Screen buttons have versioned drivers. Screen buttons need power delivery. Data lanes on pcbs. And fuck else.
Now imagine that you have a physical button. It costs cents. It closes one lane. Maybe needs power for a led.
Who the fuck wants screen buttons?
Finally. What the fuck multiple screen buttons solve that a single screen that can be any number of any buttons couldnt?
Because sure as fuck they wont solve for context, clarity and reliablity.
Bezos does not give a fuck
Ah yes, he complemented demagoguery with sharp demagoguery.
Both things are demagoguery.
Also, good thing they mention WWII. Hitler did the same in speeches. As all fascist did.
Through Lenin, Stalin to Kishi.
Physical books have no safeguards from photocopying.
I have more terrifying news about museums. We are talking pictures worth MILLIONS just waiting to be photographed.
He is not tired.
He has nothing to offer beyond entertainment and fascist slogans.
This is an act so he stays in the media.
The whole nation starved due to policies in places and people in power.
As in Stalin and stallinist party.
Fascism.
He is pandering to fascists.
Spoken like a true non-developer.
He is fronting money for development. Which is not cheap.
Once dev cost stabilizes, I would love to have a better split for artists.
Stop outing the populist fearmonger!
lol sorry cant retrain the model to remove it.
Choice becomes much, much harder once you listen to accounts about CSAM. Darknet Diaries has a few episodes on this. Some accounts are stomach churning. You can see reasoning of people pushing for the laws
And I agree. Education would go a long way. Much further than some ID verification.
But, see, education makes people smarter. What if people see through the lies of politicians?!
Both politicians and agencies are drooling at the thought of such laws. Because no one answers one simple aspect the people want answered. Who watches the watchers? Who are they accountable to?
There is a whole NPR episode on women sizing and history of sizing in general.
Eye opening how stupid it is