

It’s a fucking popularity contest and you’re deluding yourself if you think voters can be disciplined.


It’s a fucking popularity contest and you’re deluding yourself if you think voters can be disciplined.


Conway’s law strikes again!


Well, that’s why Facebook exists. The purpose of a system is what it does.


Oooph. There are critiques to be made of NATO but none of those absolve Russia of invading it’s neighbors.


Maybe I should say “critical of algorithms”. The point is it’s not engineered to "maximize engagement "


Put the AI critique aside for a moment. Many people on lemmy dont like algorithms managing their feed. There’s probably a big overlap between people who are pervasively sensitive to dark algorithms and people who perceive AI as a dark algorithm parlor trick .


Lossy compression with no internal mechanism for detecting information corruption.


Affordable cost of living is a communist plot to destroy America


The bigots are going to vote for the biggest bigot regardless.


And the execs that made thr decision to fire in the first place will be punished by giving them bonuses.


It’s wild how we cater to the feelings of such voters while telling leftists they need to vote blue no matter who to save democracy. Where is that messaging for the xenophobes?


“yeah there’s a new giant structure and there’s a new persistent and pervasive sound in the region that both appeared around the same time, but there’s no data connecting the two. It could just be the sound of my own ego”


IDK, cobol programmers still do well these days


Why is Xavier Becerra on the list? The Democratic governor front runner for California?


The description that the LLM did it on its own is subjective at best. I’ll just leave it at that. Have a good one


Without securing a popular mandate through an election? People are tired of elites rewriting the rules, how exactly is a vanguard going to be viewed as legitimate?


It’s not “bested” by the LLM though, a mathematician used the LLM as a tool to disprove a conjecture. Subtract the mathematicians from the process and the LLM would not have successfully completed the task. It would be more accurate to say a mathematician with an LLM was able to best a mathematician who did not have an LLM. Which is cool, but we don’t need to pretend the LLM is not a tool but something the “understands” math like a mathematician


You are the one collapsing tool use into a binary when there are varying degrees of competency and hand holding.


So why are you allergic to people talking about the quality of the tools in regards to capability?
Not long ago Walmart got fined by the CCP for poor food practices. Instead of saying “we disagree with the judgement” they licked the boot and said they look forward working with the government to resolve the situation. Point is, corporations should be afraid of the government, clearly Google is not afraid of the EU and as a result I expect similar behavior from them in the future.