• RangerJosey@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There’s an HFY story where the guy in the slow ship became a tourist attraction for the advanced humans that beat him to his destination.

    His bank account had grown to billions and they offered him billions more to keep it going.

  • wabafee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Sounds awesome not only you skipped the hardest part you have everything setup and get to live a good life. Unless of course that was your goal to experience building the colony.

    • AlexLost@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I think that’s exactly what one would be hoping for. One does this to escape the reality of human civilization and seek the adventure of building it over again.

    • NeptuneOrbit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s like a start up. Show up early and buy in on low stocks, work your ass off, retire at 40. I’d assume it’s something like that. Pick the best place to build your house, claim all the resources.

      Or maybe he just wanted solitude.

  • rational_lib@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    15 hours ago

    That’s another solution to the Fermi paradox. FTL travel is impossible, but can’t actually be proven to be impossible, so no one wants to be the sucker.

  • Shardikprime@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    Not only that, but 3000 years into the future, language has changed so much that the plural of SHEEP is now SHOOP

    That’s right, androids do dream of electric SHOOP

    Shit’s wild yo

    • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      1000 years alone is a wildly long time for language. Granted, written language and education are more accessible than ever, so I imagine language evolution will be significantly slower than it once was, but still I found this short of English over the past 1000 years to be really interesting

      https://www.youtube.com/shorts/WLSBCs5vcgQ

      • spicehoarder@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Have you seen how fast slang is evolving currently? I can’t even imagine translating something like “chat, am I cooked?” to my grandma.

        Also on a side note; have you noticed the rise in lisps?

        • WhatsTheHoldup@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I can’t even imagine translating something like “chat, am I cooked?” to my grandma.

          “Hey folks, am I in trouble?”

        • NιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          True! Fad based language spreads like wildfire with modern tech! At the same time, I feel like trends like that fall out of favour just as fast. It’s definitely a wild time for language evolution.

      • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        3000 years is insanely long for language. Consider that the mother fucking alphabet was invented around 1000 BC*, and basically no languages that anyone still speaks existed in their modern forms. Homer hadn’t written the Illiad and the Odyssey yet, and the standard Greek that came to be defined by these works had also yet to develop. If you went back to 1000 BC you’d have no idea what was going on.

        *Although previous alphabets existed, the Phoenician alphabet that became the basis for pretty much all modern writing systems in Europe, North Africa, and Western Asia was invented around 1100 BC

          • markovs_gun@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I know I was just saying 3000 years and basically nobody alive today understands the language. Even people who devote their whole lives to the languages around at that time are basically just making informed guesses on pronunciation and would probably struggle considerably to understand an actual speaker.

      • vithigar@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        It’s also possible that audio recording being a thing that exists will slow changes in language as well.

  • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Call that one a win.

    Take risk of signing up for a 3000 year hyper-sleep trip.

    Reap the rewards of being a pioneer without having to do any of the hard work.

    • Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      21 hours ago

      join intergalactic ship pilgrimage hoping to be a pioneer to a new world

      Land to late stage capitalism and the same oppression you were just trying to escape.

      Id shoot myself immediately.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        19 hours ago

        A mission in starfield (shit game but honestly decent writing at the very least) included just this. A generation ship finally arrived at its destination long after FTL travel was invented to find that the intended colony planet was already a fancy resort planet. You have to broker some kind of agreement between the parties.

        • 5too@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          17 hours ago

          It’s a couple of Star Trek episodes too. Similar idea is how they found Khan.

      • RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        That’s why you outfit your ship with mass drivers.

        Any parasites roaming around on your paradise? A couple hundred rocks at 2% light speed will clear that up.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Nice nice, and in the 3000 intervening years they’ve developed alpha particle cannons that shred your entire swarm of rocks and puny physical spaceship to white hot quantum loops as they sip megachampagne on their continent sized airships as they watch your fleet unwillingly transition to light

          The gun that fired the barrage was the size of a juice box floating somewhere in orbit, they have millions of them

          You didn’t even get a chance to pull your finger off of the mass driver button

  • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    22 hours ago

    3 Body Problem has an interesting take on this. Faster than light travel is not possible but communication is, meaning we’re anxiously preparing for an alien war that won’t happen for 400 years but they can see everything we do in real time thanks to quantum entanglement.

    • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      FTL coms are a concession to the story, it would have been terrible without it

      IRL quantum entanglement can’t ever provide causality breaking info. In very simple terms, you need correlation to know when the data stream began as just observing the resulting spins still seem just as random before and after the event.

      In even more simple terms: Whatever message they can send even if pre-agreed on seems like random heat results until you know the exact moment the transmission began, as confirmed by a light lagged message.

      In less simple terms, the misunderstanding comes from treating the metaphor of ‘flipping the spin north switch’ as a literal thing instead of a less-than ideal ‘lies to children’ of what is actually happening to particles that experience spin transition, and the meaning of ‘entangled’ is both less and more strange than people understand.

      But again, 3 body problem would have been a terrible story without it,t hat’s why it’s science fiction

      • daellat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        12 hours ago

        From what I’ve heard the Chinese version is rather literal to the books to a fault.

        Having read the books I enjoyed the Netflix series, but understand they made some changes to both adapt it to a series (fine) and made a lot of characters westen (a bit unnecessary maybe).

        I am excited for season 2

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        Aren’t they the same but just dubbed in english? I picked the english one as I didn’t want to read subtitles

      • Zoboomafoo@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Well the Chinese version on Prime doesn’t have any English subtitles so I guess it depends on if you can speak Mandarin

    • tane@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Good series, I always recommend the books but haven’t seen the show yet

      • blind3rdeye@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I haven’t read the books, but I did watch the show… I enjoyed the first half, but the second half had so much implausible bullshit that I couldn’t really recommend it. I mean, the first half also had crazy impossible tech - but I feel that’s ok because its part of the setup premise. The stuff I didn’t like in the second half was more implausible decision making and strategising (and also implausible uses for impossible tech).

        In any case, I really feel like they wasted a strong setup. I was disappointed at the end, and I’m not intending to watch the next session.

      • merc@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I managed to finish the first book, but it was so terrible that I wasn’t willing to read any more or watch the show.

        The whole book sets up a big mystery, then solves that mystery with the biggest deux ex machina bullshit ever committed to paper.

        • Angry_Autist (he/him)@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          13 hours ago

          macguffins are always just to drive the plot forward, their satisfaction as a solution is usually secondary.

          In simpler terms, they paint the cover of the comic book first and sometimes overbid for the purpose of sensationalism, so sometimes Superman has to pretend to punch Lois Lane

          • merc@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 hours ago

            It’s not a MacGuffin. A MacGuffin isn’t important to the story, it’s just there to serve as motivation for the characters. In the Three Body Problem, the mystery of what happened to science is central to the plot of the entire book.

            This isn’t “pretending to punch Lois Lane”. This is “why the hell did Superman just kill Lois Lane!?” The whole plot of the story is that science stops working. Scientists are killing themselves because of it. One of the characters is seeing a countdown when he closes his eyes. Aside from the Three-Body-Problem game parts, the whole rest of the book is structured as a mystery that they’re trying to solve. This mystery is the primary motivation for the characters in the book, and it’s presented as a mystery for the reader to speculate about.

            Basically, the book is structured as if it were a murder on a train, and the whole structure of the story suggests that someone on the train is the murderer. But, it turns out that the murderer is Zeus, who descended from the heavens, killed the murder victim for his own reasons, and left. Ta-da, mystery solved! (And there’s the additional bullshit that scientists are committing suicide because their experiments are failing. That’s just so ridiculous. Actual scientists would be so excited by unexpected results. The way to upset a scientist wouldn’t be to have something appear to break the laws of physics. What would upset real scientists would be a replication crisis: either they can’t match someone else’s work, or people call into question their work because nobody can match the results they’re getting.)

            And those are just the problems with the “A” plot. The “B” plot is the ultra-stupid simulation of life on a planet in a 3-body system. You know what life would be like in that kind of system: nonexistent. But no, you’re supposed to believe in people being flattened and rehydrated. I mean, come ON. And you’re also supposed to believe that people are playing this “game” and loving it. Has the author ever actually played a game? Has the author ever met any people?

            The writing is bad, the characters are bad, the science is bad. It’s just a bad book. It’s a book that dumb people read and they think the author is smart, and if the author is smart the book must be good, it just went above their heads. But, the author isn’t smart, the book isn’t smart, the book isn’t good.

    • spicystraw@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      20 hours ago

      Good show, fantastic books. Recommend to anyone reading this comment and are remotely interested in sci-fi. A lot of facinatong ideas explored throughout the series.

  • fox2263@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    1 day ago

    Well at least you didn’t have to spend the rest of your life building civilisation from scratch.

  • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    149
    ·
    1 day ago

    The first crew would face the most difficult challenges. Imagine the relief after expecting to establish the fundamentals of civilization, and instead are just assigned your living quarters.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        74
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        I guess. I’m more of a space socialist, myself. Silly me always assumed that equality and collaboration would be a precursor to colonization of other worlds. Musk is trying so hard to prove me wrong. Lol

        • ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          48
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          What if you set out with the idea of starting socialist utopia on a new planet and get there to find booming corporate dystopia?

          • confusedbytheBasics@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            20 hours ago

            If people stopped starving, beating,.and raping children for 2 generations it would be possible. Humans have no need to compete with each other for survival already. If we could just get a generation or two with minimal human inflicted trauma it would be obvious.

            Seems possible to me.

            • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              If people stopped starving, beating,.and raping children for 2 generations it would be possible.

              How do you propose we achieve this? We’d have to isolate a group of people who’ve never experienced abuse and set them up somewhere the rest of us could never come in contact with them again.

    • merc@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Except you’re basically a caveman. You leave and you’re one of the world’s foremost engineers, trusted to know everything necessary to build a new settlement from scratch, with no help from Earth.

      You get there and your engineering knowledge is 3000 years out of date. The only people who are interested in your skills are archaeologists and anthropologists. They use an app to ask you questions like “Could you demonstrate how you used woodpaper to wipe your anus?”

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        18 hours ago

        What a fascinating point. I’d be fine holding antique engineering story hour as my contribution. Who knows what old gems were lost over the years. It sounds like fun, even if I was just a novelty.

        • merc@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 hours ago

          If the records survived, they might not need anything from you, because they’ve already watched it all on video. But, maybe some of them would be interested to see it in person once. Even if we know how warriors fought 3000 years ago, it would still be interesting to see a true expert warrior using their weapons in a way that took a lifetime to master.

          If the records didn’t survive, you might be a valuable person to study for a while, but it might quickly get tiring to basically be a sideshow performer, there to delight the people who think of you as this ultra-primitive thing that’s nearly an animal.

          I would bet it would be pretty frustrating for most people after a while. You’d have this mental image of yourself as a sophisticated, modern person who was respected by his/her peers. Suddenly, you’d be living in a world where people around you might be struggling to contain their disgust. Things that are normal to you like eating meat or peeing in a toilet might be seen as animal-like behaviours.

          If you’re lucky, then your sophisticated construction and engineering techniques might be seen as impressive feats of craftsmanship. In a world where robots fasten everything that needs fastening, just driving in a nail or using a screwdriver might be seen as something really fancy, like we’d now see the kinds of stonemasonry that they might have had millennia ago.

          But, if your self-image is that of an advanced engineer, and the best you can hope for is to be seen as a quaint old-timey craftsman, that might not be very satisfying.

          • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            You’re absolutely correct from a “best practice” standpoint, but only the standards make it into records. That’s the source of our admiration of “old-fashioned know-how.”

            Real life experience can’t be catalogued. The index doesn’t have dirt under its nails. Sure, I’d be obsolete and out of place in the day-to-day, but I’d always be ready to coyboy up in a crisis.

            In the meantime, I could probably make a decent living creating one-of-a-kind newly handcrafted antiques for the neo-hipsters.

            I think I’d really enjoy our movie, btw.

            • merc@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Real life experience can’t be catalogued

              In ye olde days it couldn’t. But, what if the current database of YouTube videos survives? You’d get every non-expert trying everything in any way possible. If books and podcasts survive, you’d have every discussion on why things are done a certain way and not another way. Assuming it all survives, there’d be so much more information to future archaeologists and anthropologists than today. Right now we just dig up a shard of pottery and try to figure things out from whatever we can glean from that pottery.

              It would make for a cool movie. The only problem is trying to imagine a really distant future that makes the present look barbaric.

              They had fun with that in Demolition Man with the three shells. Star Trek TNG did it in The Neutral Zone where they had a bunch of people from the 20th century including a financier who couldn’t accept the lack of money in the future. But it’s really hard to make a future that’s believable and makes the present look barbaric.

                • merc@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  25 minutes ago

                  The Bell Riots weren’t what they were cracked up to be. Either that, or they got the date wrong.

                  But, the writers in that scene went really easy on the set dressers and costumers: “Ok, it’s a street scene in 2024, but everyone is poor, and as a result they don’t have anything built after… say… 1995.”

              • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                6 hours ago

                That’s so true. I’ve thought about that quite a lot watching sci-fi. I really enjoy the idea of trying to create a completely new culture or civilization without first seeing it as an inevitable evolutionary progression. I think that’s the only way to really imagine a civilization that far into the future.

                I love that you thought of the three shells. It’s absolutely one of my favorite sci-fi mechanics to leave unexplained phenomena up to the viewer or reader. Most stories end up as a bland socialist paradise or a dystopian nightmare. I like the idea of something different altogether, or a blend of present-day and something else entirely. Kind of like how Taco Bell won the fast food wars. Lol