• TypicalHog@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    It’s very, very simple. It’s cuz shit’s tasty AF and most people care more about themselves and their tastebuds than climate.

  • iiGxC@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because people are selfish, stuck in their ways, and speciesist. Some are also ignorant

  • nutsack@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because they’re lazy and comfortable and stupid and they don’t give a shit about anything.

  • crt0o@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Why is killing people wrong, but ok in war? Why do we still kill animals even though we know it’s wrong? Why is killing wrong in the first place? I bet you can’t find a single rational reason. That is because ethics isn’t based on reason, but instead on emotion. Given that, I don’t find it very surprising that it’s often very hypocritical.

    • YaBoyMax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Ethics may not be fully objective, but claiming that they’re fully based on emotion is a ridiculous thing to say. You can make ethical arguments based in reason. Pointing to the war and saying “see, ethics aren’t real” is an incredibly naïve conclusion to draw.

  • Akareth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because:

    • Ruminants like cows repair our depleating topsoil via regenerative farming (our current approach of using petroleum-based fertilisers is not sustainable)
    • A single cow’s life can feed a human for 1 to 2 years, compared to the many incidentally killed animals (insects, rodents, frogs, birds, etc.) during the growing and harvesting of crops, plus the destruction of entire ecosystems to create the mono-crop farms in the first place
    • Humans need to eat lots of fat to be physically and mentally healthy, and beef provides lots of fat (the low-fat high-carbohydrate diets recommended by various agencies — starting with the US’s department of agriculture in the late '70s via the food pyramid — are making us sick, with once-rare diseases such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, depression, and dementia now commonplace)
    • YaBoyMax@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This is ignoring the fact that raising a cow for consumption requires ~10 times the amount of crops per calorie compared to just eating the crops directly. Also, I don’t think I’ve heard a single health expert recommend eating more beef - the universal understanding is that red meat consumption is generally a net negative in terms of overall health.

  • JesterIzDead@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    The average human has much more of a negative effect on the environment than a cow. So, shouldn’t the question be why we tolerate so many people?

  • ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    What a loaded question.

    Outside of the fact that a single cows life provides about 900 meals for humans, and the scraps left over make boots that last for a decade and also feed our cats and dogs. Plus, it’s delicious.

    • 7heo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yeah so, the amount of meals is correct. But that’s about it. I mean, I can’t say about the taste, to each their own, but one kg of cow meat needs two dozen kg of grain.

      That’s about as inefficient as it gets.

      As for the leather, the industry doesn’t like products that last a decade, so it isn’t actually using the leather in such a way. Industrial leather boots last a year tops.

      Finally, pet food is made out of discarded cuts of meat, the uglies, etc. But also lots of cereals, and vegetables.

      So we could really afford eating less meat. It isn’t good for anything. Not for us, not for the other species (certainly not for the cows, that get often half assed butchered in a hasty way because of quotas and profit), and absolutely not for the ecosystem.

      But I guess the taste is all that matters.

  • DBT@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    Because it’s a damn good source of creatine and protein. And it tastes good.

  • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    10 months ago

    This rage bait question could be reworded as…

    Why do people consume <anything> when we know it’s bad for the earth.

    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      I think it’s valid that he chose the #1 food source problem to talk about first. Once we fix that, let’s discuss #2.