• elucubra@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    37 minutes ago

    Fun fact: ISO paper sizes are a transposition of German DIN (Deutsches Institut für Normung) sizes.

    The German’s obsession for standards is their main usefulness to humanity.

    • Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      32 minutes ago

      A0 is a square meter. Its sides are self similar, such that the ratio of long to short edge stays the same when you cut one in the middle, and thus create a new long and short edge.

      Each cut produces two sheets of the next Ax number, so A4 is four times halved compared to A0, or a sixteenth of a square meter.

      That property of being able to halve is achieved with a ratio of the square root of 2, so unfortunately the measurements in absolute numbers get pretty odd.

    • bob_lemon@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Definitions and math:

      • A series paper has a height/width ratio of √2
      • Each paper in the series is half the area of the last
      • A0 has an area of exactly 1m²
  • sleeperdouge@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I think this is a little bit outdated at least for the Philippines. Goverment documents now primarily use A4 to comply with ISO standards. Some places such as schools may sometimes use the letter size (commonly referred to as short size here) but A4 is now much more common.

    • Sundray@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Same, I figured 8 1/2 x 11 was yet another example of our pig-headed obstinance.

      • Jarix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Quebec does things differently, often simply out of spite for the rest of the country. So I won’t be surprised if they have adopted A4 provincially

  • Ephera@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    147
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Damn, that Mercator projection making A4 look almost as big as Greenland…

  • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    Oh, let’s also remember that A4 is a member of beautiful variant of an “SI system for paper”. Want a paper the size of an A4 folded double? We have A85. Want something that folds perfectly to A4? A3. One more fold? A2.

    • Statement: “I want a piece of paper that I can fold twice to get exactly a US letter size.”
    • Response: “You must be crazy.”

    Edit: Did a fat-fingering

      • elucubra@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        53 minutes ago

        2A0, and next 4A0, but there are rarely used. From A0 you mostly print from rolls, so you define the width. Large offset printing presses use formats that allow multiple A sized pages, either single or double for binding, and the needed trims.j

    • MeThisGuy@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      does all this A paper standerd business have to do with the fact that you can’t fold any paper in half more than 8 times?

          • brachypelmide@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 hours ago

            with A4’s divide-by-two shtick an A85 might unironically have a surface area of only like a couple atoms. it’s too late in the night for me to calculate this so i pass this task onto someone else

            • Pelicanen@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 hour ago

              So, A0 has an area of 1 m2 and it’s halved for each next one in the series, giving A85 a surface area of 1/(285) m2 = 2.585×10-26 m2 = 0.02585 pm2.

              The smallest atom is the hydrogen atom with a Van der Waals radius of 120 pm which gives it a surface area of 4×π×1202 pm2 = 180956 pm2 or just over 7 million times larger than the A85.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      american sizes do the same thing, just only five steps in ANSI sizes, and not really that well known outside of the industries that use the paper sizes, such as printing shops.

      smallest being u.s. letter (A4 equivalent) is “ANSI A”, 8.5x11in…

      largest being the full sheet (A0 equivalent) is “ANSI E”, 34x44in…

      with the expected three steps between for B, C, and D.

      going smaller than u.s. letter and ANSI A… letter halved (4.25x5.5in) ‘half letter’ is a common notepad and post card size; and halved again (2.12x2.75in) is a common label size.

    • f314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      ·
      19 hours ago

      What on earth are you on about with those numbers? 😅

      A0 is the base size, with an area of one square meter. Fold that in half and you get A1. Fold that in half and you get A2, and so on. Regular printer paper is A4. You’ll rarely, if ever, see sizes smaller than A6.

      • thebestaquaman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I fat-fingered the A5, otherwise the numbers were right?

        I’m aware how the system works, I just wrote about it using A4 as the “base”. A3 is what you fold to get A4, A2 folds to give A3, etc.

        I didn’t know A0 was exactly 1m2 though, TIL!

        • f314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Want something that folds perfectly to A4? A3. One more fold? A2.

          This made it sound like you meant that folding an A3 sheet twice gives A2 😅 Might just be my reading comprehension, though!

      • Rhaedas@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I was hoping that there was a metric baseline for this paper size, but it still bugs me that the dimensions aren’t “even”. 297mm? That’s no better than 8 1/2 inches.

        • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          18 hours ago

          There is, but A4 isn’t the baseline, A0 is.

          A0 is 1m² with a ratio of 1:√2. Cut that in half along the larger side and you have A1, half it again and you have A2, etc. on down the line.

          The entire series maintains the same exact ratio down to A13 at 9mmx13mm.

          • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            18 hours ago

            So ridiculously dedicated to metric that they didn’t think to make A0 an exponent of 2, and then designed an entire system around dividing it by 2.

            A0 should’ve been 1.024 meters.

            • f314@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              You’d still get «weird» lengths in the other dimension, though. Remember, the aspect ratio has to be 1 to the root of 2 for the folding in half to work.

              Also, I don’t think 1024 would have been such an obvious number back in the late 1700’s, when this system was first thought up 😅

              There is a system of sizes where the shortest side of the base size is exactly 1 meter, though: the B system. The aspect ratio is the same as for the A sizes.

        • f314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          17 hours ago

          I see what you’re saying, but the «weird» dimensions are what makes the whole thing with folding in half to get the next size work:

          The aspect ratio has to be 1 to the root of 2 for it to work, and that’s going to make some dimensions «uneven». The utility of that system is worth it many times over!

    • sem@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      They do have a paper that can fold once to get a US letter though; i am only posting about it because i only learned about it two years ago: 11x17, aka, “tabloid” size.

      Some desktop printers can even print on it.

    • Hildegard (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The aspect ratio of the A series of paper is √2, so every doubling or halving of the size retains the same aspect ratio. If you want to save paper and print at half size, you can just do that and it works flawlessly. However doing it this way means very unmemorable decimal unit dimensions.

      Half letter and tabloid are much taller than letter so you have to either have overly large margins on the top and bottom, or you have to reformat your document if you ever want to change the sizes.

      Though specialty paper suppliers do sell 22x17 paper if you really want to double fold to get letter paper. 11x17 is twice the width of letter which works for printing bifold books in letter size. Its just the scaling aspect ratio thing. Sizes in multiples for bookmaking do exist in both systems.

    • GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      18 hours ago

      There is 11"×17", it’s called Ledger paper.

      This doesn’t make the american system okay.

  • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m American and have worked in corporate offices all my life and grew up around the printing industry.

    A4/SI is super common here too. “Letter” is just something used by home users. But very often A4 is sold as “Letter A4” right next to the other paper.

    Now “legal” print format is a true abomination and unfortunately is much less likely to be easily replaced.

      • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        16 hours ago

        Lots of legal documents in the US are required to be filed in 216mm × 356mm (sometimes 330mm, both are considered standard and fit where necessary), everything from court orders to congressional acts and those stupid executive orders the orange fascist loves to sign about anything that he manages to think about for more then 2 minutes.

        But the bigger problem is that the size is also standardized on the storage and processing side, so switching sizes means we would have to change all the governmental filing cabinets, folders, folios, binders, etc too, which is slightly less likely than us finally adopting the metric system.

  • volore@scribe.disroot.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Not a meme; I am an American and I think this would be the exact right kind of petty bullshit to respond with, please push for this, Canadians. It is exactly this kind of petty, stupid bullshit that Trump participates in and responds most to.

    • NateNate60@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      British Columbia basically did a similar thing by declaring permanent daylight savings time because, according to the premier, they’re no longer going to wait for the US to move as well before moving themselves.

      Except now the situation is objectively worse than it was before, because BC is geographically in the UTC-8 zone, but permanent Pacific Daylight Time is the same as permanent Mountain Standard Time (UTC-7). Except they don’t call it Mountain Standard Time in BC, they stubbornly continue to insist they’re in the UTC-8 zone. Except they don’t call it “Pacific Daylight Time” either, they call it just “Pacific Time”. No “Daylight”. Despite the fact that their standard time is what the rest of North America calls Mountain Time.

      They had four good choices, and chose none of them:

      • UTC-8 year round, call it “Pacific Standard Time”
      • UTC-7 year round, call it “Mountain Standard Time”
      • UTC-8 or UTC-7 year round, call it “Western Canada Time”.

      Decent idea, rubbish execution.

      • VAK@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        They probably just saved some paperwork. Anyway, all people care were the time zone difference, not name

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The name causes confusion. Let me give you this example. What time UTC would “17:00 PT” be?

          That question depends now not only on what time of year it is, but also where. “Pacific Time” now no longer uniquely identifies a single timekeeping scheme.

          • VAK@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            What I understood was PT is UTC-7, PDT is UTC-7 and PST is UTC-8, am I right? I am guessing in Canada you all were refering to PST and PDT as ‘pacific time’ and that causes confusion?

            • NateNate60@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              “Pacific Time” means “whatever the civil time is in the Pacific Time Zone, accounting for daylight saving time”. So that would be 23:04 (UTC-7) as of writing.

              If today’s date were instead 30 December, “Pacific Time” would be 22:04 (UTC-8) in Washington, Oregon, and California, while it would be 23:04 (UTC-7) in British Columbia and Yukon. Both would be called “Pacific Time” despite not being the same time, and both being on standard time.

        • NateNate60@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          Because UTC-7 and UTC-8 are also wrong. The label “Pacific Time” means, in the United States and Mexico, the civil time standard that observes standard time at UTC-8 and daylight saving time at UTC-7. You cannot call this standard merely “UTC-8” because then it’s wrong half of the year.

          It is important to note that by calling year-round UTC-7 “Pacific Time”, British Columbia and Yukon are the ones stepping out of the programme to do something idiosyncratic. The rest of the Pacific Time Zone (Washington, Oregon, Idaho, Nevada, California, and Baja California) has a greater population than the entirety of Canada. There are approximately 56 million residents of the non-Canadian portion of the Pacific Time Zone, where standard time is UTC-8, compared to 5 million in the Canadian portion, which is UTC-7.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      American style petty bullshit isn’t going to accomplish anything. This kind of thing costs Canadians and doesn’t impact the US at all. This is the exact kind of petty bullshit Trump does regularly since it’s popular with Americans.

  • I propose a new standard for printing.
    Laser-etchable circular paper with 2 holes in middle which helps rotate it on a spindle, and hang it without unvanted rotation.
    The printer will have a spindle with 2 prongs, and single axis movable laser assembly used to etch the paper as it spins.

  • Geth@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    18 hours ago

    I’m honestly shocked by anyone south of the US not using the SI system considering they use metric otherwise.

  • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Only used A sizes through my academic career. I know that was a long time ago but even going to stores they list a4/5 as sizes.