Looney Tunes, for me. When I was growing up through the 90s and 2000s, Looney Tunes was about as large as life itself. Bugs, Daffy, Taz, Sylvester, Marvin the Martian .etc were staples anywhere in culture. However, it felt like some pendulum swung another direction because there’s solemn mention of Looney Tunes in the past 10 years.

And I’m trying to not say that Looney Tunes has faded away, it still has made shows as recent as 2020 that lasted until 2024 and a movie that was this year. But I’m saying that it’s cultural relevance has taken a backseat and it doesn’t help that its parent company, WB, has been treated as nothing more than just an asset to be acquired while those who acquired it, aren’t doing a lot with the name to bring it back to its former level.

It’s kinda like how Tom and Jerry were huge (still are to an extent) but its cultural significance as of late, has largely taken the same backseat where you don’t hear as much from them as you used to.

  • myyass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I think part of it was the drill your brain with an auger kids shows were designed to be addictive to kids; baby shart, poop patrol, peppered pig, and the list goes on. I butchered the names but if you have kids or nieces and nephews then you know of these torture devices. I mean blues clues was at least tolerable, my sister loved that show. And there’s the tellitubbies, I would make fun of that to myself, stinky winky, but at least it wasn’t as bad as what my sisters kids watch now. My sister did watch the rescuers down under until the cassette broke sigh, so I’m surprised she didn’t have them watch that.

  • Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    COVID.

    It’s not gone anywhere. People are still dying. Others are still getting long covid, and probably for life.

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      During the pandemic, it felt like life would never be the same again. Now it feels like the pandemic never happened

  • cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    3D TV sets. There was one year where they were the definitive future of TV, and then everyone just never mentioned them again.

    • petenu@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      3D is one of those cyclic hype things that comes around periodically, once people have forgotten the previous cycle. This isn’t the last time.

      • AskewLord@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        VR is the same. pops up once every generation. is massively hyped about revolutionizing entertainment and the world, and then is totally forgotten.

        and a small batch of enthusiasts keep it alive in computer labs.

        • Emi@ani.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          I’d say VR is very much out of the lab now. Yeah its not as common as normal pcs but still quite common and available. I got vr myself and love it, the experience is its own thing. And there is quite a few games and programs for it. So I don’t see it as just temporary thing, it was just getting better and better for the past 10 years.

        • insanemantis@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          23 hours ago

          It’s just… such a novelty. Like, I don’t know if I’d want everything to be 3D or VR all the time. It’s the kind of fun that’s only fun in moderation

          • Toasticus@piefed.socialOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            19 hours ago

            What turns me off from VR is having to have a headset on your head to even enjoy it. Plus a dedicated room so you’re not hitting anything. It’s an expensive entry point.

          • AskewLord@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            22 hours ago

            yeah, it offers no legit benefits to anything really, other than being novel.

            it’s mostly driven by the fantasy/ideal of ‘brain in a vat’ type scenarios and weird tech nerds who think could must escape physical reality if they had sophisticated enough computer simulation in their sensory perceptions.

            when the boring ugly truth is most people can’t stand it for more than a short period of time without having side-effects.

  • yermaw@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The hole in the ozone layer.

    That was going to kill us all and was Earth’s Big Bad. Then they just kinda fixed it and forgot to tell us and we just sorta forgot about it.

    • spittingimage@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      16 hours ago

      We didn’t fix it, we just stopped making it worse. It’s still the reason you don’t step outside in the summertime in New Zealand without sunscreen.

      Another 300 years and it should be right as rain, though.

    • Finding out the hole was fixed in, like, my late 20s was wild.

      “What about the hole in the ozone layer?”

      “They fixed that like 10 years ago, dude.”

      “THEY TOLD ME IT WAS THERE WHEN I WAS STILL IN HIGH SCHOOL 10 YEARS AGO! 😬 Those bastards lied to me!”

      • kettuli@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 day ago

        Technically the hole is still there, it’s just not as big of an issue nowadays. Then again the bad chemicals are still used and leaked in especially China so it could make a comeback.

    • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 hours ago

      A young woman from UW, go huskies!, is the reason why

      “classical computers can indeed tackle predictive recommendations at a speed previously thought possible only with quantum computers. “I actually set out to demonstrate that quantum machine learning algorithms are faster,” she explains. “But, along the way, I realized this was not the case.”

      https://cacm.acm.org/news/the-algorithm-that-changed-quantum-machine-learning/

    • hexagonwin@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      21 hours ago

      is it? i haven’t seen post quantum cryptography (?) alert when connecting to some machines in openssh until pretty recently, i assumed there’s been steady development in that area

      • Krudler@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Yeah it’s toast. All the movers and shakers left the field in the last year or two because they’ve acknowledged that it’s a giant shell game and it’s hopeless.

        • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          The speed gains were all an illusion. Quantum computing was still hypothetical and the algorithms used to make these predictions were essentially preloading all the data needed to make the gains into the hypothetical computer drastically cutting down compute time. This wasn’t a real reflection of how quantum computers could work, having a data lake of ALL the info ALL instantly accessible, and when you took that away, or rather gave classical computers that same massive hypothetical advantage the speed of classical computing was just as good as the hypothetical quantum computing.

  • Naich@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    ·
    2 days ago

    Climate change. It’s an existential threat which no one seems to actually care about enough to do anything. In many cases leaders are intentionally doing all they can to make it worse. The world has gone insane.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      I think there’s two issues. First, it’s that people are so drained, because there’s been next to no progress (negative progress recently) because the elites can keep themselves from being regulated.

      Second, the media has stopped covering it to the same degree because more and more are purchased by those same elites. They want to bury it, so they give it minimal space.

      Basically, we’re fucked, but there’s also almost nothing an individual can do about it. The only hope is for an absolutely massive movement that would need to overturn society as a whole pretty much at this point.

      • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        14 hours ago

        But there’s been tons of progress, renewables are growing way beyond predicted rates and their price is dropping like a rock also way below predicted rates

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 hours ago

          CO2 emissions are growing as fast as ever though. Yeah, we’ve gotten better at creating energy from renewables, which is great, but the dirty energy sector keeps coming up with reasons to consume their products, at increasing rates. I thought the crypto crash would bring it down, but AI came in to save it.

          (My theory is the AI bubble is by design. Crypto was failing, so they decided AI would be the new datacenters to increase consumption. I don’t think the product was ever the goal. It’s just an excuse. The energy consumption is the goal.)

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      The world has gone insane.

      I used to care a lot about it. then the scientists were silenced. then discredited. then the protestors were targeted. then the government said it’s all a hoax.

      now? now I collect information. information about where specific people plan to go. how long they expect to be there and what kind of personnel they will have with them. then? then, I wait. I wait for the opportunity after all the chaos.

      you see, we don’t have to survive global climate change. we just have to survive long enough.

    • Scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 days ago

      Agree, it’s a daily thought for me but no one cares. I’ve made my home as stable against it as I can, but I see everyone else just not giving a fuck. Honestly I’m not having kids because of climate change, all experts point to death and destruction and I see no need to bring children into that. The people who downplay it have no scientific experience and a lot of backers who want to keep the status quo.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    AIDS.

    I came of age during the crisis and it would be hard to exaggerate how big a deal that was. Sex could kill you, not just ruin your life. Sex ed in 7th grade was more like a haunted house than a classroom.

    EDIT:

    I took sex ed in 7th grade in one of the former Slave Holding States. Due to a quirk in the reconstruction State Constitution, many cabinet positions were voted on instead of appointed. (this point was to weaken the Governorship should a black man gain the office).

    Anyway, at that time, Democrats had controlled the Secretary of Education for decades and the sex ed course was surprisingly comprehensive. They taught us about contraception, STIs, consent, as well as the anatomy of human reproduction. Abstinence was emphasized.

    We kinda had two sex eds. One in Elementary school that was segregated by sex; taught in a single day; and was basically “you may notice changes in your body” type lecture. Obviously, sex wasn’t mentioned at all.

        • KC_Royalz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          Probably what it is given rural Nebraska. I’ve asked my daughter because she’s in 7th grade and she says no we haven’t had any class.

          I mean we’ve had the talk with her and she’s had some questions but I know there’s other questions that I think she would be more comfortable answering in front of peers instead of her own parents

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Nothing surprises me about this.

    People can’t afford food. Many are living in their cars. I can’t reasonably expect people to care about a damn thing over than surviving another day.

    • AskewLord@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      it’s because we got a lot better at finding oil and found out we have way more of it than we thought.

      • MrOtingocni@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        He should, it’s a lot of fun! They have a huge cookout, hamburgers, hotdogs. But you can’t have any of it. You have to sit in a lawn chair and watch as the neighbors come over and eat your plate.