Right-wing influencer Laura Loomer announced she is taking a “brief hiatus” from her Loomer Unleashed podcast just hours after a Trump administration adviser exposed her for being paid to post some of her manic, hateful content.
It all started on Thursday, when Alex Bruesewitz, who is behind much of Trump’s digital media strategy, took aim at conservative social media influencers following the GOP’s massive midterm election loss.
“Believe it or not attacking Democrats over their relationships with a streamer (Hasan Piker) wasn’t an effective hit,” Bruesewitz posted, not mentioning Loomer by name. “GOP candidates probably shouldn’t take messaging advice from fringe right-wing ‘influencers’ moving forward.”
Loomer took the bait.
“But they should take their advice and meetings with @TuckerCarlson instead?… It’s completely reasonable for people to be appalled with Democrat candidates campaigning with a guy who said America deserved 9/11. Hasan Piker regularly makes comments in support of jihadi groups,” she wrote. “What wasn’t helpful was your friend Tucker Carlson essentially endorsing Abdul El-Sayed over Mike Rogers and using his show to tell people to not support Rogers just a few weeks out from an election. But we all know you will never condemn your buddy Tucker.”
“Laura, you are basically the Republican version of Hasan Piker. Democrats over the years have attacked Republicans for affiliating with you. Those weren’t effective hits either,” Bruesewitz replied. “Voters simply don’t care enough about ‘influencers’ or streamers. lol”
Loomer took offense to that, claiming that she was not an influencer and criticizing Bruesewitz for his association with Omeed Malik, a conservative venture capitalist and major Republican donor.
“I’m a journalist and an opposition researcher Alex. What are you? What is it that you do for Omeed Malik exactly? He’s a Muslim right? Half Iranian and half Pakistani if I’m not mistaken,” Loomer fired back. “Is that why you have such an issue with the things I say about Islam?”
“Okay lol. But is it common for journalists to get paid for their opinions and tweets?”
“You say ‘Okay lol.’ Not sure why you are laughing. I recall last year your company X strategies reached out to me asking me for help. Do you deny that? What is so funny? I guess I don’t get the joke,” Loomer said, admitting that she was indeed paid to tweet. “You loved sharing my journalistic reports during the 2023/2024 DeSantis-Trump primary too. What changed?”
“No I don’t deny that. I’ve paid you for tweets before. I haven’t for at least a year though,” Bruesewitz wrote back. “I also know you still get paid by others for tweets so I do think it’s fair to refer to you as an ‘influencer.’ What percentage of your tweets are paid for?”
…
Hours later, Loomer announced a “one to two month show hiatus.”
Lol amazing.
I love his reply, “no I dont deny that. Ive paid you for tweets before” 🫳🎤
Is she like pinocchio, except every time she lies her chin gets bigger?
She should start a wrestling team with the DELL lady.
These women-like people benefit from chaos, instability, and polarization. Twitter-like platforms incentivize and reward engagement regardless of misinformation or propaganda
“I’m getting married, and I want to give this exciting part of my life the time that it deserves, as I’ve spent a lot of time fighting for our country, and for President Trump—sometimes at the expense of my own personal life,” she said.
Imagine marrying someone who clearly blew Trump.
Him: You are getting herpes in my chlamydia. Her: You are getting chlamydia in my herpes.
She’s doing the classic tit press. On a pus filled sausage skin.
She could use more filler.
make it permanent
You’re a yatus!
i really don’t know much about hasan piker, but fucking hell he is really living in their domes rent-free.
He’s also an influencer. Just random bozos with marketing skills getting millions of followers to do nothing but film themselves collecting their own farts and huff them from a plastic bag.
Piker is very much “new media”. He’s been caught saying things that can be taken out of context and was burned by right wingers for it. I might not agree with everything he says, but he’s definitely not a terrible person either.
Why does this platform glaze Hasan Piker so hard? LMAO it’s so gross. He’s a fucking look at me. He doesn’t stand for anything but money.
When you respond to a calm and reasonable opinion by instantly jumping to accusations of “glazing” and I ironically write LMAO, then you sound like you’re more in line with Laura Loomer, who sounds just like this above.
It really shows everyone what kind of person responds so strongly to the guy.
Because people like you always attack the messenger, never the messages.
So, when people go watch out of curiosity, they realize you lied to them. He doesn’t promote gambling, has any ads or grifts with the manosphere alpha male bs. He just covers the news 8hrs everyday and he platformed most of the candidates you saw win in the blue wave by getting them donors, door-knockers, phone-callers, etc. in front of hundreds of thousands of people in Twitch + YouTube.
You, in the other hand, do nothing but complain about shit that is impossible, like demanding all socialists/communists live like Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber: In the middle of the woods with nothing in their name, just a long-ass beard. It’s hard not to assume you’re just a concern troll trying to disarm socialism/communism of their resources to fight.
Why does this platform glaze Hasan Piker so hard?
You know, I don’t think it actually does. Every time his name comes up, people just pop out of the woodwork to cry about how terrible he is, usually without a shred of evidence (lil clips don’t count). It kept happening so often that I decided to just watch some of his content and make up my own mind. And you know what’s fucking wild? Everything I’ve seen shows me he’s a reasonable person.
I did the same. Not a fan of how loud and chaotic he runs his stream with popup graphics, sound effects, chat roll etc. but that’s fine not everything needs to be to my taste. From what I saw he seems to use a bunch of sarcastic and inflammatory comments to make his points which opens him to being clipped out of context. Kind of fits into the “you’re not wrong, you’re just being an ass” category to me which I also think is fine. Even the whole 9/11 comment thing is understandable. I feel like it’s widely accepted that 9/11 was a consequence of the US’s worldwide aggression and heavy handedness with Piker’s comments reflecting that sentiment in an insensitive way. How many Iranians do you think are out for blood after having a girls school blown up let alone all the other shit going on?
This platform doesn’t glaze him, there’s just about an equal amount of people that say they like him as say they dislike him in every thread/post he’s mentioned as far as I’ve seen.
What makes you think he stands for nothing but money?
My understanding is he is a tankie. So a mix of left and right as commonly understood - the left associate with him because of the overlap, and the right see the opportunity to divide the left on the areas where they disagree. But apparently he puts on a good show to attract audiences of the size he has. Guess it might be helpful to have someone with many left views to counterweight all the Joe Rogan types that are solidly right.
He’s a lot of things but he’s not a tankie.
TIL Laura Loomer thinks she’s a journalist.
They all think they’re journalists unless they’re being sued, then suddenly they’re commentators or entertainers.
I feel so seen lol
You were sued for something you wrote in your capacity as a journalist and then tried to evade consequences by claiming you’re just an entertainer?
More called out than sued, it’s like the shitposter’s “just a prank” :p
Aha. Yeah I thought that was weirdly specific, like, I’d wanna hear that story hahaha. Np. :)
Eat each other. Do it.
I thonk it should be illegal to push someone else’s message without an explicit and obvious disclaimer.
Beyond that I think it is shameful and embarrassing. Anyone who posts other people’s opinions or propaganda as their own for money should feel like a piece of shit, because that’s what you are.
I thonk it should be illegal to push someone else’s message without an explicit and obvious disclaimer.
Representing it as your own message when someone else wrote it, OK. Otherwise it steps on free speech far too much.
The listeners should have a right to know whose message they are hearing. It’s a civil issue - I think any laws should have fines and required communication fixes, not any criminal charges or jail time - but allowing fake grass roots movements that are actually collaborations between billionaires and grifters is harmful to civil society.
It’s not free speech if you get paid to say it.
I think that’s what they actually said.
The FCC already has rules that influencers must disclose they were paid to endorse a product. That why you see those “#ad” tags in YouTube videos or whatever. It’s kinda crazy that it doesn’t extend to political influencers.
It does still impact political influencers, just not in the desired way since the content itself nor the group it’s endorsing aren’t a product per se. They should close that loophole.
I thonk
Derp.
Yu dun thunked?
Apparently I didn’t thonk very hard
Thank.
Why use many word, when few word do trick?
Thenk again
Thönked
Bröther. May I have some thöughts?
There used to be a law against using federal funds to spread political propaganda domestically, but it was abolished some time in the past few years.
Hey, I heard we control both houses now. Hmm.
One stopped and admitted he did it. The other doubled down.
Hasan is still doing it. Loomer took a break. She’ll be back too. It’s just a fucking grift for all of them.
Fortunately, I read the article and know it’s not about Piker.
No it’s about Loomer. And all of the other grifters. But it’s also about Piker because it’s the same bullshit.
I mean, journalists, newscasters and any other media organization about news are being paid to say what they’re told. We all know that, but I don’t think it makes a difference. The 1% decides what most of us hear.
I think there is an extremely big difference in how I view a message coming from someone who believes what they are saying, and someone who i know is getting paid to push a message.
I will actually attempt to process and debate someone’s honest opinion. A paid shill? You know its disingenuous so why even waste your time on it.
I’m a journalist and an opposition researcher Alex
Hahaha. Oh wait, you’re serious, let me laugh even harder:
HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
An “opposition” researcher who litteraly blows the potus? It’s also so funny seing maga blaming the deep state.
Holy shit, that is delusion cranked up to 11 and tearing off the knob.
Honestly the MAGA crash out has been so amusing, especially locally and online with all of these influencers.
The thing about posting for a living is that you can get owned out of a job
Jigsaw will return…
