• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    So why is it rejected?

    Just because they’re still trying to use HDMI to prevent piracy? Who in fuck’s name is using HDMI capture for piracy? On a 24fps movie, that’s 237MB of data to process every second just for the video. A 2 hour movie would be 1.6TB. Plus the audio would likely be over 2TB.

    I’ve got a Jellyfin server packed with 4K Blu-ray rips that suggest there are easier ways to get at that data.

    • sarmale@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      9 months ago

      Can’t you compress what the HDMI outputs in real time so that it would have a normal size?

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Sure. But why bother when you can rip it right from the disc in higher quality than you could ever hope to capture in real time?