If you were hoping at some point to see HDMI 2.1+ on Linux with AMD + Mesa, you're out of luck right now as it's simply not going to be happening.
  • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
    English
    0·
    9 months ago

    Always thought that display port is better anyways lol. Anything that HDMI does or have that display port doesnt?

    • Solrac@lemmy.worldEnglish
      0·
      9 months ago

      Audio? Forgive my ignorance, It is out of actual ignorance or rather lack of knowledge

      • MeanEYE@lemmy.worldEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        Naah, DisplayPort carries everything from audio, USB, displays, etc. Version 1.2 even allows daisy chaining displays, so you don’t have to have number of cables going to your PC. When it comes to audio, version 1.4 supports 1536 kHz maximum sample rate at 24bits and supports 32 individual audio channels. Scary good! Overall it’s significantly better protocol.

  • Blackmist@feddit.ukEnglish
    0·
    9 months ago

    So why is it rejected?

    Just because they’re still trying to use HDMI to prevent piracy? Who in fuck’s name is using HDMI capture for piracy? On a 24fps movie, that’s 237MB of data to process every second just for the video. A 2 hour movie would be 1.6TB. Plus the audio would likely be over 2TB.

    I’ve got a Jellyfin server packed with 4K Blu-ray rips that suggest there are easier ways to get at that data.

    • sarmale@lemmy.zipEnglish
      0·
      9 months ago

      Can’t you compress what the HDMI outputs in real time so that it would have a normal size?

      • Blackmist@feddit.ukEnglish
        1·
        9 months ago

        Sure. But why bother when you can rip it right from the disc in higher quality than you could ever hope to capture in real time?

  • csolisr@hub.azkware.net
    01·
    9 months ago

    If we had to relay exclusively on non-proprietary protocols, I doubt that GNU/Linux would have gone anywhere beyond the Commodore 64

    • Riskable@programming.devEnglish
      1·
      9 months ago

      Linux never ran on the Commodore 64 (1984). That was way before Linux was released by Linus Torvalds (1991).

      I’d also like to point out that we do all rely on non-proprietary protocols. Examples you used today: TCP and HTTP.

      If we didn’t have free and open source protocols we’d all still be using Prodigy and AOL. “Smart” devices couldn’t talk to each other, and the world of software would be 100-10,000x more expensive and we’d probably have about 1/1,000,000th of what we have available today.

      Every little thing we rely on every day from computers to the Internet to cars to planes only works because they’re not relying on exclusive, proprietary protocols. Weird shit like HDMI is the exception, not the rule.

      History demonstrates that proprietary protocols and connectors like HDMI only stick around as long as they’re convenient, easy, and cheap. As soon as they lose one of those properties a competitor will spring up and eventually it will replace the proprietary nonsense. It’s only a matter of time. This news about HDMI being rejected is just another shove, moving the world away from that protocol.

      There actually is a way for proprietary bullshit to persist even when it’s the worst: When it’s mandated by government.