• hoshikarakitaridia@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I disagree.

    Both sides are bad, no matter who is currently the aggressor.

    Now because there is aggression, the aggressor has an obligation to stop it, and we have an obligation to force a stop in the conflict as well. But that doesn’t make the other party less Bad in this. Both sides killed a lot of innocent people, both have inhumane ulterior motives and both are supporting further escalation. But ofc if there’s only one party doing the fighting, then that’s the party that acutely needs to be stopped.

    This distinction is very important to me, because you are not suddenly the good guy because you stopped killing civilians. You are just not actively doing war crimes which means we don’t have to intervene because of you anymore, which is at least one less reason. But you are not holy because “this year it was only 300 war crimes”.

    • LordGimp@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      “Both have inhuman ulterior motives”

      Palestine wants to be free

      Israel wants to genocide Palestine and live in their homes

      Yes I can see how wanting liberty and self governance is exactly the same as wanting more land for your historically landless people regardless of how many natives you have to kill. Completely balanced

      • Bigmouse@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The attacks weren’t perpetrated by a free Palestinian people or some recognized advocacy group, but by an extremist wing of the Muslim Brotherhood that has been pushed by Israel for decades.

        • man_in_space@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          And the Palestinians vote them in.

          If White Southerners are responsible for the Civil War, the Palestinian people bear responsibility for choosing a genocidal majority.

          My sympathy for the Palestinians only goes so far—it ends with their ballot box.

          • Bigmouse@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            It’s a bit more complicated than that. Palestine doesn’t have a strong democratic tradition to begin with. Additionally, Hamas is only governing Gaza, not the West Banks. Hamas also suppresses secular Freedom organizations. And ~50% of the people in Gaza wouldnt even be able to vote out Hamas since they are under 18. Then we have the case of Hamas indoctrination, which finds fertile soil in the impoverished and destitute Gaza youth.

            All of that isn’t to say I support Hamas. I am quite vocal in my disdain for them. But Israel plays a significant part in their success. So does Iran. And let’s not forget that the religious right has been torpedoing a resolution aswell, not just the Jihadist organization Hamas. Rabin wasn’t killed by a palestinian hardliner.

    • Amaltheamannen@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      So forcing an entire people’s into ghettos and taking their land, while putting them under blockade and only reluctantly letting I’m small amounts of aid and food, all while bombing them weekly is actually good, because sometimes they fight back, making them the aggressor?