Peanut, who has amassed more than half a million Instagram followers, was euthanized by officials to be tested for rabies.

Peanut, the Instagram-famous squirrel that was seized from its owner’s home Wednesday, has been euthanized by New York state officials.

The New York State Department of Environmental Conservation took Peanut, as well as a raccoon named Fred, on Wednesday after the agency learned the animals were “sharing a residence with humans, creating the potential for human exposure to rabies," it said in a joint statement with the Chemung County Department of Health.

Both Peanut and Fred were euthanized to test for rabies, the statement said. It was unclear when the animals were euthanized.

  • NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    107
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    14 days ago

    The only charge is “potential to spread rabies” and they killed the animal to test for that (for some reason). So, if the test comes back negative, they will make full repariations right?

    • borf@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      91
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      14 days ago

      No, the cruelty is the point. The kind of people who made this happen have common sense just like the rest of us, that 7-year-old squirrel didn’t have rabies. They refuse to make exceptions or use common sense because they specifically want to hurt others.

      • rishado@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 days ago

        I feel like these are kneejerk reactions to the headline. Think with your brain not your heart (I’m not trying to be an ass, forget about the cutesy animals and think about this guy owning wild animals and exploiting them for money on social media) The cruelty is not the point. You can’t just own wild animals without a license and without veterinary care…

            • AlphaAutist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              11 days ago

              lol calm down there kid no need to get upset. I thought you needed a license to run an Animal Shelter, but I guess not. Not being disingenuous I just misunderstood.

          • rishado@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            12 days ago

            And it specifically does say he was in the process of getting a license for peanuts the squirrel, but he also has been doing this for 7 years. And only now was he in that process.

    • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      14 days ago

      full repariations

      And surely such reparations would take into account future lost revenue, as they would be expected to it this were a regular person against a corporation.

      Surely.

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 days ago

      It’s because rabies infects the brains of animals, so that’s the tissue that is tested.

      I’m wondering why the people who were caring for the animals didn’t just get them rabies shots in the first place.

      • jerkface@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        29
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        I wonder why animal control officers who handle animals suspected of having rabies DON’T HAVE THEIR FUCKING RABIES VACCINATION. I needed a thousand dollar shot just to volunteer for a fucking animal shelter.

        • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 days ago

          They could have, but if the animal had already bitten a human, that extra few weeks’ wait is dangerous.

          • originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            40
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            14 days ago

            got it, this was pure animal control spite. they only claimed a bite after they seized the animal ‘for testing’. their timeline is bullshit.

            at least some good came of it

            Longo and his wife moved to Upstate New York last year to start P’Nuts Freedom Farm Animal Sanctuary, which is named for his pet and officially opened in April 2023

          • tate@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            Anyone bitten by a wild an animal should be treated for rabies. To wait for the animal to be tested, quickly or slowly, is just foolish. This animal could have been quarantined and observed without any danger to the bite victim.

            edit: the animal needn’t be wild, just as this one was not.

            • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              13 days ago

              the prophylactic really fucking sucks to take AFAIK, you want to avoid it just a little bit less than rabies.

              • Cypher@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                13 days ago

                The newer vaccine is far less painful and even then, there’s not much that’s as bad as rabies.

                You want to avoid rabies harder than anything other than being immolated… and really that still might be preferable because it is faster.

          • rtxn@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            14 days ago

            These keyboard warriors don’t understand how fucked up rabies can get. Near 100% fatal once the infected becomes symptomatic, and it’s probably one of the worst disease-related deaths I can imagine. I’d rather take a cyanide pill.

            I live near a forest where the fox population had to be culled because of the potential contact between humans or their pets and infected animals. There were billboards and television announcements that warned against approaching a wild animal that is acting friendly because it’s an indicator of infection.

            • Talaraine@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              37
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              14 days ago

              These animals lived with their owner for years and were consistently photographed for Instagram. Yeah, people know how bad rabies is. They clearly didn’t have it.

              And officials are saying that no wildlife rehab service in the entire state of New York could take these two in? Internet famous, celebrity animals? Man, whoever believes that, I’ve got some land to sell ya.

              • rtxn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                arrow-down
                21
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                They clearly didn’t have it.

                How can you tell? The incubation period of rabies can last for years.

                Internet famous, celebrity animals?

                They were squirrels on Instagram. That amounts to nothing.

                • Dirac@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  18
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  Talk about bad faith arguments, lemme guess, you filed the complaint?

                • Talaraine@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  They mean donations to whomever takes them in. Believe me, that means something to them. These guys never even tried.

            • jerkface@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              There is a prophylactic for rabies. The squirrel had to be destroyed because it bit a human whose job it was to work with animals suspected of having rabies. These people are already trading human well-being for the sake of the price of a slightly expensive shot. It’s theater to suddenly pretend to give a shit about rabies after you’ve had one of your employees get bit.

            • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              14 days ago

              Just have to chime in and say 100% fatal once symptomatic. I really hope someone corrects me but I’m pretty sure there has never been a confirmed case with a recovery; we have a treatment that works, but has to be given relatively soon after exposure.

              Edit: lol, was the downvote for me hoping I was wrong, or being wrong?

              • rtxn@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                13
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                14 days ago

                There were cases where symptomatic patients survived, but the number is in the lower single digits and they all suffered debilitating neural damage. I wouldn’t call it recovery, no.

                The immunoglobulin treatment aims to eliminate the pathogen before it can infect the nervous system. Once that happens, once the headaches start, it’s game over.

                • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  14 days ago

                  Oh wow, that’s pretty awesome (not the debilitating neural damage part), I was always under the impression that by the first symptom it was a death sentence.

                  I still never want anything to do with it, but at least it isn’t as bleak as I had been lead to believe.

                  • rtxn@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    14 days ago

                    It’s called the Milwaukee protocol, and it’s considered to be a failure.

                    The patient is put in a medically induced coma and treated with strong antiviral medication until the natural immune system can produce antibodies, but even a successful treatment doesn’t guarantee survival. Also, the debilitating neural damage. Honestly, I might still prefer a morphine overdose.

        • its_prolly_fine@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 days ago

          No, rabies is an absolutely bizarre virus. The progression of the disease is highly variable. The person peanut bit could star displaying symptoms before peanut. Once symptoms show up, you are essentially dead. Rabies has one of the highest death rates of know human diseases. The only definitive way to test for rabies is testing brain tissue. The amount needed for a high confidence result is too much for the animal to survive. So the animal is always euthanized. That why having all pets that can be vaccinated, vaccinated is so important.

      • hedgehogging_the_bed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        14 days ago

        Rabies vaccine is only made for a handful of animals. For example a vaccine is made for domestic sheep but not for domestic goats. Goats and sheep are closely enough related that goats owners have their animals vaccinated using the sheep vaccinations but since they have not been officially tested, you can’t say the animals have been vaccinated for rabies in a legal capacity so the petting zoo has a big sign about the rabies risk in goats.

        I think this is mostly a case on NY state’s sick of people ignoring their wild animal laws and with NYC especially they can’t allow for people to just keep whatever animal they want and think it’s okay. If Peanuts owner had been licensed as an actual wildlife rehab, it would have been different but wildlife are not pets even when they are friendly.

    • bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Unfortunately rabies testing requires samples of the brain. This is why if you are bitten by an animal you suspect of having rabies, a professional should catch it and test the animal. The tests that exist for diagnosis in living humans are not reliable.

      https://www.cdc.gov/rabies/php/laboratories/diagnostic.html#:~:text=Rabies testing requires that the,after an animal is euthanized.

      In this case I didn’t open the story to see why they believed a domesticated squirrel needed to be tested.

      Edit: somebody that didn’t interact with the animals complained they might have rabies?

      • Master@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        14 days ago

        No. Its illegal to own as a pet. Someone reported him for that. When they were collecting peanut he bit someone and That’s why they put him down.