• boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      How is this incorrect? In which field? And how do you confirm you the validity of your methodology?

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 months ago

        Replication rarely happens and in many cases is outright impossible due to lack of shared code.

        Things should be replicable, but that hasn’t been the case for a while.

        • boyi@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          the correct term you need is ‘unachievable’, not ‘false’. […] anyway, it depends on the field and type of study.

            • force@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Common standards for language formally used in a specific field/profession/discipline aren’t “wordplay” lol

              • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                8 months ago

                This isn’t a professional forum. Playing the “it’s a technical term” game is absolutely wordplay.