What is your line in the sand?

Edit: thank you all for your responses. I think it’s important as an American we take your view points seriously. I think of a North Korean living inside of North Korea. They don’t really know how bad it is because that is all hidden from them and they’ve never had anything else. As things get worse for Americans it’s important to have your voices because we will become more and more isolated.

Even the guy who said, “lol.” Some people need that sort of sobering reaction.

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Canadian here.

    Before Trump? Ehhh, not really. I’ve always viewed the US as a place where you vote for which oligarch-backed monarch you’d want to put in absolute power for 4 years. Every 4/8 years the new incoming overlord just rips up whatever the previous one did and nothing of substance is actually achieved.

    After Trump 2.0? No. There isn’t a snowball’s chance in hell that Trump is going to surrender all that power he and the GOP have accumulated. And why would he? He doesn’t have to. He literally controls every branch of government that he can and ignores those that he doesn’t. If the US ever has another election it will purely be for show, like China’s elections. The mask is now fully off and the charade of US democracy is over as those who actually wield the power now do so openly on their sleeves.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    For the time being, sure. I dint think democracy is a binary. Democracy doesn’t imply a fair system or universal suffrage or a system where power is split.

    Like for example the Vatican is a absolute monarchy and also a democracy.

  • nonentity@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Anyone who is eligible to vote, and chooses not to, implicitly throws their support behind whoever wins.

    On 2024-11-05, ⅔ of US citizens who were eligible to vote told the rest of the world they don’t want to be taken seriously for at least 2 years.

  • tauren@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The US had always been a questionable democracy with the hyperfixation on the president and just two parties setting the agenda, but I’d argue that it’s still a democracy, though it is a rapidly deteriorating one.

  • JacksonLamb@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    still consider

    It has only two political parties, and a weird system where all votes are not equal and the actual vote majority doesn’t always win.

    It has frequently had multiple people from the same families running for office, and only wealthy people have a shot. Corporations get to lobby for laws in their favour.

    It also spies on its own citizens, holds people indefinitely without trial, has a huge prison population, a militarized police with a high homicide rate, and is the only western nation with the death penalty.

    Trump and Musk are laying bare how fragile the veneer of “democracy” really is in that country.

  • TXL@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Absolutely not. A two party system was barely nominally a form of democracy. Current one quacks like a dictatorship and walks like a dictatorship. They might hold a fake election one day like many of those do, but still no.

    • JubilantJaguar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Firstly, the USA is obviously not a “dictatorship”. Come on, be serious. Words mean things.

      Second, America’s two-party system also has internal factions and primaries, many of them completely open (you don’t even need to declare allegiance to the party). The primaries are effectively the first round in a two-round electoral system (of which there are plenty in the world). The whole point is to create a binary choice in the final round. For some reason this always gets missed by otherwise informed observers. “There are only two parties” is just not a valid argument in this debate.

      Of course, none of these facts will be popular here, since the real point of this thread is to allow participants to performatively dump on the shared hate-object. Classic social media, I get it.

      • TrippaSnippa@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Firstly, the USA is obviously not a “dictatorship”.

        You sure about that? Have you read the news lately?

        • Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Yeah I have and saying that kinda just makes you seem uninformed.

          Like the people who call the US “a 3rd world country in a Gucci belt”. It just makes it super obvious that you don’t understand how high quality of a life the average person has in the US. Especially globally.

          • thermal_shock@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            I’m not going to list all the red flags, but there is a reason people feel like this. A few major ones, president talking about taking over other countries out of the blue, attacking our allies to the point where Americans are suffering much more than necessary, his sidekick doing Nazi salutes on stage, literal commercials for his $idekick on the white house lawn.

            It’s pretty clear there is no rule of law for blatant corruption and no accountability. Replace USA/Trump with Russia/Putin or NK/Un, guess what, same shit, different smell. Either follow orders or get shipped out is the example they’re trying to set, as well as making free speech illegal.

            We’re FAR from a functioning democracy.

  • Freewheel@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    First off, I’m an American. Born a stone’s throw from the location of one of the critical events in the history of the American revolution.

    To answer the question, no. Leaving aside the whole Republic versus democracy argument, my point of realization was when one party seized upon a minor technical issue and disenfranchised countless voters via lawsuit, sufficient to allow the race to be called in their favor.

    I’m sure there are many readers who believe I’m talking about 2016. For those readers, your keyword search is “hanging Chad”.

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Ignoring court orders, and “fake national emergency declarations” to create war and international extortion and remove rights and citizenships for deportations crossed the line. The voter suppression/rigging that won election for Trump is also clearly anti-democratic, but anti-democratic as usual. Media/oligarchy/Israel influence/disinformation might not make for an ideal democracy, but also “democracy as usual”.

    The big problem with the world is the US empire’s manufacturing of hatred/war against “those who are less democratic than us and our colonies” Corruption of democracy in US, who can cheaply manipulate democracy in its colonies, means that you don’t have functional democracy either. US praises the most violently oppressive apartheid ethnostates suspending federal and local elections as great democracies if they support US wars. There is something wrong when the most important issue of your government is to increase divisiveness/threats to the US’s enemies when the US unjustifiably threatens you, and that thrills you as right track.

    So, democracy is simply not working at bringing progressiveness and shared prosperity, or even the most basic understanding of humanist/national interests, to those who say they love it so much. This is global collapse level of delusion. Nations doing best economically are those distancing themselves from US colonial control.

    The more objective measure of “good government” is control against oligarchist pillaging, while having pluralism/sustainability, and economic constructiveness. US approved democracies are failing hard on these metrics. Warmongering based on “blanket, evidence free, refusal to accept election results when non-CIA candidate wins” is not the democratic/liberal ideal you think it is.

  • TeaWalker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Am Dutch. I have considered the US an incomplete democracy since I learned about voting in school. It’s not one person one vote, which to me is crucial for a democracy. The US right now is still a nation of laws, but democracy is sharply in decline. The voter-roll issues and Gerrymandering come to mind immediately. Not to mention the fact that guaranteed access to polls has been pulled by the courts. Which is insane to me.

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Also president having so much power was clearly never democratic to begin with as we can see it all play out now.

      • RupeThereItIs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The power of the president did not start out like this. Congress kept giving their power to the executive for political reasons.

        It happened over centuries.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    125
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    No. And I haven’t for a while now. Looking at your electoral system (electoral college, gerrymandering etc.), it probably never was but it was never as obvious as it is now.

    • tiredofsametab@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I grew up in the US and have lived outside it for 10 years now. I would agree with this. Voting and representation have never been total and is definitely less available for many groups. Further things are being stripped away.

    • Brave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Yeah. My wake-up call was quite early in life, when SCOTUS handed the election to GWB. If I was born a generation earlier I’d have called it with Watergate. If I was an ancestor currently dead, I would have called it around the time an assassin put the presidency in the hands of the opposite party, and a drunk asshole subsequently decided reconstruction efforts should fail. Or possibly just prior, when we somehow decided not to hang every man Jack of the confederacy for treason.

      Edit: an earlier still version of me would have overseen the death of a culture brought on by poxy mad white religious extremists, and laughed ruefully to hear that centuries later the utter bastardy continues unchanged.

  • DasFaultier@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    90
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    See, as a German, when I see a country go down the same route as the Weimar Republic after handing over the power to the Nazi party, I think it’s just very obvious. Hitler took some two months to completely destroy democracy, and the US are juuust in the middle of that. History doesn’t repeat, but sometimes it rhymes, and the similarities are just remarkable.

    So yeah, I guess that would be a big fat trench in the sand.