• Pickle_Jr@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    158
    ·
    7 days ago

    If Republicans truly saw companies hiring illegal immigrants as an issue, they’d be able to easily crack down on business owners doing the hiring and make the punishment more than just a slap on the wrist.

    No, the cruelty towards other humans is the point. They don’t care about the non-existent issue.

    • TimLovesTech (AuDHD)(he/him)@badatbeing.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      7 days ago

      The slippery slope here is that deciding who is “illegal” may vary wildly depending on who Trump empowers (legit or just some Nazis that want “safe streets”) to decide this. He has had people saying just undocumented, but also people saying anyone that isn’t a full citizen (so anyone here with a Visa/Green Card/work papers/migrant workers/refugees/etc.).

      You also know that when the Nazis/KKK folks get to work they are just going to be grabbing people that “look illegal” or that run from them/their mob (because they look dangerous!).

      This is also going to have a HUGE impact on food prices when farmers have nobody to pick crops.

      • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        It is a civil offense to be in the US without permission (I.e no visa), so the Trump admin would likely have to change the law to deport these people.

        It is a criminal offense to enter the US without permission. These people could be deported.

  • vapeloki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    95
    ·
    7 days ago

    Greetings from Germany. Maybe you want to skip everything that happens from now on and end this before this lunatic takes office.

    On a unrelated topic: aren’t you the nation with the most guns?

    • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      72
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      aren’t you the nation with the most guns?

      Yes, and ownership is predominantly with those who want to kill/ deport immigrants. In the US, there are ~120.5 guns per 100 people. However, this statistic is misleading, because you might expect most people to have 1 gun, and a few people to have more than one to get to that statistic. However, most households do not have a fire arm.

      So the average gun-owner, actually owns from 4-8 guns, while the majority of Americans own 0 guns. We have a culture of gun-obsessed rightwing psychopaths.

        • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          25
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          As a non-right wing, non-psychopath, I’m uncomfortable with the idea of owning a gun at all.

          I don’t want one in my home and I don’t want one on my person. Even if I did purchase one and ended up using it to protect myself, the knowledge that I took a human’s life would be too much for me to live with.

        • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 days ago

          Its always interesting and telling how people respond to things. Your assumption that I don’t own a fire arm tells me more about you than it ever would myself.

            • TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              7 days ago

              I’m really sorry if you’re having a bad day,

              Why did that lead you to respond in such an angry manner?

              I think you need to take a breath and check to see if you’ve made any correct assumptions whatsoever in this conversation. The tone of my response couldn’t be more sanguine.

    • ERROR: Earth.exe has crashed@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      6 days ago

      The majority of voters who cast a valid ballot voted for him, what do you even do with those people? You get rid of their leader, another take their place. The military took an oath to the constitution, that included recognizing the results of elections, regardless of if they are a fascist. The US isn’t a Defensive Democracy like modern day Germany, we aren’t getting rid of them until the next election, that is, if there ever is a next election.

      • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Trump has cult of personality, it will implode without him. Vance is an empty suit, RFK is nuts and sounds horrible, Musk is Saxon African Chris chan. My point is once Trump is dead most of his movement will most likely go static.

  • Matriks404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    6 days ago

    Who the fuck knew we are going to see the fall of America in our lifetimes. The only thing I hope for at this point is strong Europe.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      6 days ago

      Who the fuck knew we are going to see the fall of America in our lifetimes.

      No one thinks major downward shifts will happen in their lifetime…until they do. Our great shame is that we voted for it.

      Writing’s on the wall. We’re squarely on the path of decline.

      Only thing to debate now is the timeline.

    • TheLowestStone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      I remember pointing out to my 8th grade social studies teacher that most countries don’t get to exist for over 200 years, especially after they have a massive civil war.

        • SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Many European countries that we know today didn’t exist in their current form that long ago and had a major war preceding the establishment of that nation. Kingdom of the Netherlands and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg were formed in 1815 and Kingdom of Belgium 1830 before they were always subjects of a bigger empire or kingdom. Unification of Italy 1871 when Rome was finally captured and French Republic formed in 1792, France’s latest form is the Fifth Republic established in 1958. Germany only unified in 1866 before that time it was a bunch of smaller states and kingdoms, then after 1919 became the Weimar Republic, Federal Republic of Germany in 1949 and then fall of the wall in 1989. Independence of Greece 1821. Those examples aren’t the only ones and don’t forget the western Balkans, those nations were all formed in the 90’s.

          It’s not that the country of America will disappear after a civil war but it might not be called the USA anymore.

        • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          The number of them that havent had a massive civil war or have been forced to reform because of war is fucken Sweden, Switzerland, and maybe Portugal im not familiar with their history. No Lichtenstein and the other micro nations dont count.

          • mint_tamas@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            6 days ago

            The comment I was replying to stated that countries don’t get to exist beyond 200 years. There are several countries that exist way beyond the 200 year mark, many of them much longer.

            • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 days ago

              Rome still exists, the Roman Empire does not. They were referring to systems of government, you are referring to land masses.

  • tunetardis@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    79
    ·
    7 days ago

    Speaking as a Canadian, I’m confused. If you boot out all the undocumented, where are you going to find the migrant workers to do all the unpleasant, if not downright dangerous jobs? And many of those are in red states. What does that leave? The convict workforce? I guess that is huge in the US.

    We have migrant workers here too. They come on temporary visas, so they are technically documented. But the whole sector is rife with discrimination and human rights violations regardless.

      • ObstreperousCanadian@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        6 days ago

        This. Defunding education, removing social safety nets, and scaling back labour laws all will force whole families of low income workers to replace the migrant workers for the same or worse pay.

        • A_cook_not_a_chef@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          6 days ago

          Absolutely. My comment was just a quip/ meme, but I do worry that what you laid out is their goal.

          They have indicated in Project 2025 that they plan to rollback various safety nets. Unfortunately, the US is already lacking in that.

    • plz1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      7 days ago

      He’ll be focusing on undocumented folks in blue states, first, for sure. But economists are already predicting skyrocketing grocery prices as labor scarcity is forcibly introduced by these deportations, either way.

      My guess, he focuses purely on “shock and awe” by targeting blue cities with workplace raids rather than just going to literally every farm in the south.

      • AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        In my blue state, they’d have to use purely federal resources. Local law enforcement is not required to cooperate

        • kboy101222@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          26
          ·
          edit-2
          6 days ago

          Spoiler for you: they’ll comply and cooperate. Police aren’t known as bastions and liberal policies and agendas. They’re overwhelming MAGAts

          The police are not your friends

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            6 days ago

            Police are just as lazy as anyone else. While there will be a few turncoats, I’d expect them to generally go along with “you can snub a fed and do nothing”

          • AA5B@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 days ago

            I’m sure they are in every state, and can do enough to make headlines, continue stoking outrage. However they don’t have the manpower to actually take it seriously, or to investigate beyond what big name they want to use for propaganda

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yup.

      Getting rid of a ton of cheap labor is not good for an economy.

      Red states will suffer more.

      They’ll ask for more federal funds to support them than they already do.

      Their daddy in the big seat will give it to them.

      Just more of our money going to a bunch of ignorant/racist fools who can’t learn to vote more intelligently.

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        6 days ago

        In a roundabout way… If they get the handouts, they will see trump as the saviour. The fact he caused the issues are irrelevant or that it costs something else so they can get their trump food stamps…

        • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          6 days ago

          It doesn’t matter how badly this administration fails. At the end of 4 years they’ll find a way to blame Democrats and praise Trump, even though that makes no sense because their team is in total control.

          But that’s the nature of a cult.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      edit-2
      7 days ago

      A migrant worker is not undocumented. Many are here in a legitimate work visa and it’s heavily used in farming.

      Undocumented aliens comprise several subgroups and I suppose you can say “I really meant ….”.

      For example the most common illegal is a formerly legal visiting student or worker who overstays their visa. And as you said, this is an area subject to human rights violation and discrimination: an employer can treat someone as poorly as they want, when someone is subject to deportation if they lose their job

    • apocalypticat@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 days ago

      Step 1: be rich

      Step 2: bribe the government to do your bidding

      Step 3: decimate the workforce of your competitors

      Step 4: profit, buy out competition, become “too big to fail”

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 days ago

      They will use the newly incarcerated immigrants as slave labor as apportioned by the 13th amendment.

    • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      where are you going to find the migrant workers to do all the unpleasant, if not downright dangerous jobs?

      Replaced by forced labor.

    • blattrules@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Don’t worry, I’m sure he has a concept of a plan for that…or he didn’t bother thinking about it yet because he’s so stupid he can’t think more than a single step ahead for anything.

  • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    5 days ago

    This is just a reminder/informative comment noting multiple USSC rulings since the 1970s have allowed CBP to violate the First and Fourth Amendments with impunity, as long as they are within 100 miles of an international border. Critically, ports of entry, such as international airports, are legally considered international borders. This means that virtually the entire US population is within 100 miles of a “border”.

  • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    7 days ago

    Reposting my comment again.

    Like the German version of Nazis before them, they aren’t coming for their biggest target first. They’re coming for their political opposition, the “abortionists”, the atheists, the drug users, the mentally ill…

    RFK Jr.:

    “I’m going to create these wellness farms where they can go to get off of illegal drugs, off of opiates, but also illegal drugs, other psychiatric drugs, if they want to, to get off of SSRIs, to get off of benzos, to get off of Adderall, and to spend time as much time as they need — three or four years if they need it— to learn to get reparented, to reconnect with communities,”

    Re-education camps, huh.

      • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        7 days ago

        It seriously sounds like one of those bullshit dystopian things. “Oh he’s getting better on the wellness farm.” Meanwhile dude is in a fucking gulag.

      • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        Trump has said he is bringing back mental institutions. They don’t exist yet, so, concentration camps until then.

        I’m not going to a camp or prison for my managed mental illness, so I guess they’ll have to kill me and kidnap my children.

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    6 days ago

    History repeats itself (because humans are stupid).

    Pick up a history book to find out where it goes from here.

    • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yup.

      Obviously that’s not an option for the vast majority. But if you have the means, then there are absolutely 1st world countries where you can live a longer, healthier, less stressful life where you are afforded more rights.

      This ship is sinking. Maybe slowly, but definitely sinking.

  • irotsoma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    And all of the military stationed at the border will be turned around to keep people in once Trump moves on from immigrants to trans people, or some other group who will be forced to flee the country to avoid being put in the concentration camps that will be empty and need people to keep the prison companies’ profits up.

  • SirMaple__@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    6 days ago

    Canuck here.

    Doesn’t the Posse Comitatus Act prohibit the use of military (other than National Guard and Coast Guard) for this purpose?

    I see they can be used but only if the Insurrection Act is invoked (might be other ways but that’s the one that came up most frequently in my searches).

    • Soulg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      6 days ago

      It does.

      But when none of the checks actually step in to stop it, then what difference does it make?

    • irotsoma@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      Presidents are now immune from prosecution for basically anything they do in an official capacity thanks to the corrupted Supreme Court. So who’s going to stop him? Even if Congress makes a new, specific law against it with dire consequences, he’s putting loyalists in law enforcement and the courts can’t enforce the law when the highest one will overturn any ruling because of that interpretation.

      • SirMaple__@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Presidents are now immune from prosecution for basically anything they do in an official capacity thanks to the corrupted Supreme Court. So who’s going to stop him?

        Yeah that’s the scary and totally MESSED UP thing. I really hope there are some good folks in the US armed forces that will resist and go by the book. But I’m not holding my breath.

        All we can do at this point is wait and see what happens.

    • PugJesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Oh hey look, there’s the ultraconservative Sulla, why does he have his entire army with him?

  • humanspiral@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    One key problem with using military, in national emergency martial law power, is “put anyone brown looking onto a bus”. Don’t you carry your citizenship papers on you at all times?